Iran and the chimera of capitulation

The article discusses the expectations of Trump and Witkoff regarding weaker parties in negotiations, suggesting they anticipate these parties to concede. However, it emphasizes that unlike in real estate transactions, factors such as ideology and national pride play significant roles in international relations, particularly with Iran. The complexities of these dynamics are explored, highlighting the challenges of assuming that ideological commitments can be easily overridden by strategic interests. The piece ultimately reflects on the nuanced landscape of negotiations where cultural and national identities are at stake, complicating the notion of capitulation.

• Trump and Witkoff's views on weaker parties in negotiations.
• The role of ideology in international relations.
• National pride as a significant factor in negotiations.
• Challenges in assuming easy concessions from parties.
• The complexity of cultural identities in diplomatic discussions.